Estimation of cefepime, piperacillin, and tazobactam clearance with iohexol-based glomerular filtration rate in paediatric patients.

PURPOSE: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations reflect kidney function imprecisely. We aimed to describe whether iohexol-based GFR or eGFRs predict clearance of cefepime, piperacillin, and tazobactam in pharmacokinetic (PK) models in this population and its clinical significance. METHODS: Hospitalized patients (0.5-25 years) with haemato-oncological disease and infection receiving cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam were included. PK samples were collected at a steady state concomitantly with samples for iohexol-based GFR. PK models were developed in NONMEM. Weight, postmenstrual age, iohexol-based GFR, different eGFR equations (Schwartz updated, Lund-Malmö revised, CKD-EPI, Bouvet, Schwartz cystatin C-based) were tested as covariates. Probabilities of neurotoxic/therapeutic concentrations were assessed by simulations. RESULTS: Fifteen patients receiving cefepime and 17 piperacillin/tazobactam were included (median (range) age 16.2 (1.9-26.0) and 10.5 (0.8-25.6) years, iohexol-based GFR 102 (68-140) and 116 (74-137) mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively). Two-compartment model provided the best fit for all drugs. Weight was covariate for central and peripheral compartment, clearance and intercompartmental clearance (only tazobactam), and postmenstrual age for clearance (excluding cefepime). Iohexol-based GFR was the best predictor of clearance. The model of cefepime without vs with iohexol-based GFR underestimated the probability of neurotoxic concentrations (28.3-28.6% vs 52.1-69.3%) and overestimated the probability of therapeutic concentrations (> 90% vs 81.9-87.1%) in the case of iohexol-based GFR 70-80 and 130-140 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. CONCLUSION: Iohexol-based GFR can predict better than eGFRs the clearance of cefepime, piperacillin, and tazobactam in children and young adults with haemato-oncological disease and infection, warranting further investigation as an indicator of renal function to improve targeting of therapeutic window. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2015-000,631-32, EudraCT 2016-003,374-40 (24.10.2016).

Glomerular filtration rate in children and young adults with haemato-oncological disease and infection is best described by three-compartment iohexol model.

BACKGROUND: Children with cancer and infection may develop glomerular hyperfiltration. With the aim to determine the prevalence of glomerular hyperfiltration in children and young adults with haemato-oncological disease and infection, we developed population pharmacokinetic model of iohexol. We further aimed to assess the accuracy of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations and single- or two-point measured GFR (mGFR) formulas compared with GFR based on iohexol clearance from our population pharmacokinetic model (iGFR). PROCEDURE: Hospitalised patients (0.5-25 years) with haemato-oncological disease and infection were included if their eGFR was ≥80 ml/min/1.73 m2 at the screening visit. Iohexol plasma concentrations were described by population pharmacokinetic model. Bias, precision and accuracy of 23 eGFR equations and 18 mGFR formulas were calculated. RESULTS: Total of 32 iohexol administrations were performed in 28 patients. Median (range) eGFR was 136 ml/min/1.73 m2 (74-234) and age 15.1 years (0.8-26.0). Three-compartment model with allometric scaling of central, one peripheral compartment and clearance (with power 0.75) to weight fitted the best. Median (range) iGFR was 103 ml/min/1.73 m2 (68-140). All except one eGFR equation overestimated GFR. Lund-Malmö revised eGFR equation performed the best, followed by Gao equation. Of single- or two-point mGFR formulas, 15 overestimated iGFR. Modified Jacobsson formula at 5.5 hours performed the best, followed by Fleming formula at 3 hours. CONCLUSIONS: In children and young adults with haemato-oncological disease and infection, renal function is best described by iohexol clearance from three-compartment pharmacokinetic model, while eGFR equations and single- and two-point mGFR formulas overestimate iGFR.